Reimbursement Risk Assessment

Finerenone / Kerendia treating chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes

Nephrology

Please enter your work email

Related Reimbursement Risk Assessments

Primary Risk Drivers

Below is a snapshot of domains that materially influence the MARA Rating. 

Clinical effectiveness

The clinical evidence from the FIDELIO-DKD trial indicates that finerenone improves kidney function and slows disease progression compared to placebo, demonstrating a moderate benefit. However, the lack of direct comparisons against SGLT2 inhibitors limits the strength of the evidence.

Cost effectiveness

The cost-effectiveness estimates for finerenone are within the acceptable range for Healthcare resources, with ICERs below £30,000 per QALY gained in various scenarios, indicating a strong economic value.

Quality of life

The evidence suggests that finerenone may lead to improvements in quality of life, particularly in managing chronic kidney disease symptoms. However, specific HRQoL data from validated instruments were not extensively detailed in the document.

Supporting Domains

Safety and Adverse Effects

Finerenone has a generally acceptable safety profile, with hyperkalaemia being the main adverse event. Most adverse events were mild and manageable, indicating good tolerability.

Comparator Selection

The document notes that finerenone was not directly compared with SGLT2 inhibitors, which are relevant comparators. This lack of direct comparison raises concerns about the robustness of the evidence.

Patient Population and Subgroups

The trial population is broadly representative of the intended patient population, with a good balance of demographics. Subgroup analyses were also considered, enhancing generalizability.

Care Pathway Integration

Finerenone can be integrated into existing care pathways with minor adjustments, primarily as an add-on to standard care, which is manageable for healthcare providers.

Resource Use and Cost Implications

The budget impact of finerenone is manageable, with potential cost savings in the long term due to improved patient outcomes and reduced progression to more severe disease states.

Evidence Quality and Robustness

The evidence is primarily based on a robust Phase 3 trial (FIDELIO-DKD), although there are some limitations regarding the generalizability of the results to the broader population.

Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Broader Impacts

There are notable uncertainties regarding the cost-effectiveness model, particularly concerning the assumptions made about treatment effects and the lack of direct comparisons with SGLT2 inhibitors.
Full Legal Disclaimer and Usage Terms

The MARA Rating® is an independent opinion of a drug’s market access pharma risk profile and is provided for informational purposes only—not as investment, medical, legal or any other type of advice. See our full disclaimer here.